Posts tagged Massachusetts

201 CMR 17-00, AES, anonymity, behavioral advertising, breach notification, California, cloud computing, contracts, DPA, Eavesdropping, encryption, EU Data Protection Directive, GLBA, HIPAA, HITECH, IAPP, Kearney, Massachusetts, personally identifiable information, pii, RFID, social networking, spam, SSN, TCPA, telemarketing, text messages, UK ICO, VPPA

Celebrating Data Privacy from A to Z

By InfoLawGroup LLP on January 28, 2010

In honor of Data Privacy Day and its spirit of education, I thought it might be appropriate (and fun) to celebrate some (but certainly not all) of the A, B, Cs of Data Privacy. Would love to see your contributions, too!

201CMR17-00, Massachusetts, risk, WISP

Analyzing the Risk-Based Factors of Massachusett's Data Security Law

By InfoLawGroup LLP on November 18, 2009

SearchSecurity.com published an article by me yesterday (Interpreting 'risk' in the Massachusetts data protection law) concerning the risk-based elements of Massachusetts' data security regulation (201 CMR 17.00, et. al). The gist of the article is that any company that chooses anything less than "strict compliance" with the specific written information security policy ("WISP") and control requirements of the regulation must be able to legally support their decision based on the regulation's risk elements. What this amounts to is developing a legal opinion interpreting and applying those risk-based factors to the organization's particular circumstances.

information security law, information security law legislation, Legislation, Massachusetts, Massachusetts personally identifiable information service provider, personally identifiable information, service provider

Massachusetts' Revised Personal Information Security Regulation (201 CMR 17.00)

By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 03, 2009

Massachusetts' Office of Consumer Affairs & Business Regulation (OCABR) recently released a revised version of its "Standards for the Protection of Personal Information of Residents of the Commonwealth" (the "Regulation"). This August 2009 version modifies the February 2009 version of the Regulation. The press release for the new revision is here, and the FAQs released by OCABR appear updated to address some of the changes in the regulations.For ease of reference, ISC has taken the time to create a REDLINED VERSION showing the revisions in the new Regulation. The redlines indicate changes between the February 2009 version and the August 2009 version of the Regulation. Also included below is a summary of some of the more significant changes.