Amnesty International, article III, certainly impending, Clapper, data breach, fraud, hacking, identity theft, injury-in-fact, standing, theft
Does Clapper Silence Data Breach Litigation? A Two-Year Retrospective
By InfoLawGroup LLP on February 25, 2015
copyright, False advertising, Lanham Act, standing, Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court Provides a National Standard for Who Can Sue for False Advertising Under the Lanham Act
By InfoLawGroup LLP on April 01, 2014
11th Circuit, causation, cognizable harm, damages, data breach, data security, Hannaford data breach payment card PCI DSS, identity the, motion to dismiss, motion to dismiss negligence security breach litigation standing injury-in-fact, negligence
Eleventh Circuit Rules "Damages" Properly Alleged in Data Breach-Identity Theft Lawsuit
By InfoLawGroup LLP on September 17, 2012
damages, data breach, Hannaford, motion to dismiss Hannaford data breach payment card PCI DSS, payment card, PCI DSS
Federal Appeals Court Holds Identity Theft Insurance/Credit Monitoring Costs Constitute "Damages" in Hannaford Breach Case
By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 24, 2011
In a significant development that could materially increase the liability risk associated with payment card security breaches (and personal data security breaches, in general), the U.S. Court of Appeals 1st Circuit (the "Court of Appeals") held that payment card replacement fees and identity theft insurance/credit monitoring costs are adequately alleged as mitigation damages for purposes of negligence and an implied breach of contract claim. The decision in Hannaford could be a game changer in terms of the legal risk environment related to personal data breaches, and especially payment card breaches where fraud has been perpetrated. In this post, we summarize the key issues and holdings of the Court of Appeals.
Breach, damages, litigation, personal information, privacy, security breach litigation
California Federal Court Holds that Damages Properly Alleged in RockYou Data Breach Case
By InfoLawGroup LLP on April 19, 2011
In what may be a sign of an evolving judicial atmosphere and approach concerning data breach lawsuits, a Federal judge in the Northern District of California District Court recently refused to dismiss various causes of action related to a data breach involving RockYou. In particular, the Court explored the issue of whether the plaintiff sufficiently alleged "harm" arising out of the data breach. This blog post takes a look the highlights of the Court's decision.
Breach, consumer fraud law, damages, duty, employee, employee privacy, employer, litigation, negligence, notification, social security number
IL Appellate Court: No Duty Exists to Safeguard SSNs for Purposes of a Negligence Claim
By InfoLawGroup LLP on February 03, 2011
InfoLawGroup recently discovered a new data breach case, one of the first that we are aware of in the United States, that dives deep into the issue of whether a common law duty exists to safeguard personal information. In Cooney, et. al v. Chicago Public Schools, et. al¸ an Illinois appellate court actually rendered a decision holding that no such duty exists under Illinois law. In this blogpost we take a closer look at the court's rationale for dismissing the plaintiffs' negligence claim, as well as the other interesting holdings of the court.
damages, Hannaford, litigation, payment card, PCI DSS, security breach
"Damages" Last Stand - Maine Supreme Court Puts an End to the Hannaford Bros. Breach Suit
By InfoLawGroup LLP on September 22, 2010
The Maine Supreme Court has rendered its opinion on the "damages" issue in the Hannaford Bros. consumer security breach lawsuit. Again, the plaintiffs have been unable to establish that they suffered any harm as a result of the Hannaford security breach. Specifically, the Court ruled that "time and effort" alone spent to avoid or remediate reasonably foreseeable harm do not constitute "a cognizable injury for which damages may be recovered." In this blogpost we take a closer look at the Court's rationale.
damages, injury-in-fact, motion to dismiss negligence security breach litigation standing injury-in-fact, negligence, security breach litigation, standing
Quickhits: Federal Judge Dismiss Aetna Data Breach Case Due to Lack of "Injury-in-fact"
By InfoLawGroup LLP on March 12, 2010
ADCR, BJ, BJ Wholesale Club, Breach, card, Club, damages, doctrine, economic, economic loss doctrine, fraud, Hannaford, litigation, loss, Massachusetts, mastercard, negligence, payment, payment card, PCI DSS, PCI DSS litigation, retailers, TJX, unfair practices, unfair practices Massachusetts visa mastercard ADCR, visa, Wholesale
Massachusetts's Highest Court Delivers BJ Wholesalers (and other Retailers) a Data Breach Liability Gift
By InfoLawGroup LLP on December 23, 2009