File-sharing powerhouse Dropbox has agreed to pay $1.7M to settle claims brought against it by the District Attorneys of Alameda, San Diego, San Francisco and Sonoma Counties. The regulators alleged that Dropbox violated California’s law on automatic renewals by failing to properly disclose the terms associated with its autorenewing Dropbox Pro subscriptions and by failing to get consumers’ affirmative consent to those terms. Continue Reading
But brands could face legal troubles along the way
We all know that spokespeople and endorsers can be erratic. Wild antics can generate negative PR and damage brands. What if you could eliminate the threat of a spokesperson going rogue while still tapping into the massive influencer audiences? Although swapping the Kardashians for virtual influencers might sound like a dream come true, the reality is that virtual influencers and their creators bring their own set of PR and legal challenges.
Meet Shudu Gram and Miquela Sousa. Shudu is billed as the world’s first digital supermodel while Miquela, also known as Lil Miquela, is a virtual influencer. As unreal as Max Headroom, they are merely online personas fashioned out of the imaginations of artists. Shudu was invented by a photographer, and Miquela’s creators are cloaked in secrecy.
Chamber Global and Chambers USA 2018 have released their new rankings and InfoLawGroup is once again recognized for Media and Entertainment in Illinois, with two of our partners, Justine Gottshall and Jamie Rubin, being highlighted. Ms. Gottshall was also ranked nationally by Chambers Global and USA for privacy. We, of course, want to thank our clients for the positive feedback received.
Per Chambers Global and USA, our team is lauded for being “an innovative boutique firm dedicated to resolving cutting-edge media, entertainment and technology issues on behalf of content producers, distributors, marketers and third-party platforms. Also well versed in privacy and cybersecurity.”
Clients told Chambers Global:
- The firm is “very practical and accessible. The team understands business issues and doesn’t over-lawyer matters. They evaluate risks in an efficient manner.”
- The lawyers are “very accessible” and “they know the answers when you ask.”
And when describing specific InfoLawGroup lawyers, clients told Chambers Global:
- “Justine made an effort to understand the nuances of our business.” Another interviewee said: “She is proactive and raises issues in ways that allow us to address them before they become a problem.”
- Ms. Gottshall’s knowledge of privacy issues is “completely up to date. “You can take the most obscure questions to her because she is a walking encyclopedia.”
- Mr. Rubin “understands the business and gives us practical advice.”
Clients also said that Mr. Rubin “helps us understand how to move forward and find solutions. He is well versed on content creation and distribution issues across different areas, including digital, film, TV and live entertainment.”
“He is always helpful, regardless of whether it is a complicated issue or a quick question,” says a client. Justine Gottshall is “known for her privacy work,” say market sources. She also handles data security and technology matters, as well as advertising issues.
About Chambers Global 2018
Chambers Global covers over 190 countries across the world and also includes Region-wide and Global-wide sections. Each jurisdiction features one or more practice areas. It ranks leading law firm networks around the world, by region and practice area. Chambers Global is published annually in February. In addition, information, such as mergers or lawyer moves, is kept up-to-date on the website throughout the year.
About Chambers USA 2018
Chambers USA covers all the states in the USA. Law firms that have a national presence are also ranked in our Nationwide tables (which focus on those firms that are the country’s best in their respective areas of practice). In every state we rank the leading law firms in at least four areas of law: Corporate / Commercial, Labor & Employment, Litigation, and Real Estate. In most states we cover more than four areas of law, so that the guide overall covers 45 different practice areas on a state and national level. Rankings at state-level are based upon the location in which a firm or lawyer practices regardless of where the clients, deals, and cases take place.
In the wake of increasing major cyber security incidents—such as the recent Equifax data breach that affected about 140 million U.S. consumers— the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued its interpretive guidance on cybersecurity disclosures in late February. The guidance was highly anticipated within the business community, which had expected it to affirm and expand the cybersecurity disclosure guidance the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporate Finance issued in 2011. Almost immediately, however, the guidance slammed into a buzz saw of criticism from the media for failing to institute any major changes the original guidance.
But what it lacks in expansion, it makes up for in affirmation. When rules and guidance such as these are staff-generated, there is a perception that SEC commissioners aren’t bound by those recommendations. With this guidance, the commissioners have now endorsed what the Division of Corporate Finance staff established seven years ago—giving it a sense of permanence.
This week saw a watershed opinion from the New Jersey Supreme Court that should stem the tide of purported class actions brought under New Jersey’s Truth-in-Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act (or “TCCWNA”). We have written previously about TCCWNA litigation here and here. Since our last update, a number of courts have issued opinions favorable to defendants, but this most recent decision in Spade v. Select Comfort Corp., Op. No. A-57-16 (078611) (N.J. Apr. 16, 2018) is a significant victory for a nation of potential defendants and should bring a sigh of relief to those doing business in New Jersey. Continue Reading
A D.C. Circuit Court has ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under President Barack Obama overreached in part when it issued its 2015 order providing guidance and interpreting the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in an attempt to rein-in robocalls and unwanted text messages. This long-awaited ruling in—ACA International, et al., v. Federal Communications Commission—provides some relief to marketers, while still retaining a consumer’s broad right to opt-out.
The court looked at four challenges to the FCC’s rules: (1) how broadly to interpret an “automated telephone dialing system”; (2) whether it is a TCPA violation to call a number that previously gave consent if the wireless number has been reassigned (without the caller’s knowledge); (3) how a consenting party may revoke consent; and (4) whether the FCC’s exemption for consent for certain health care related calls is too narrow. The court ruled in favor of the challengers for (1) and (2), and upheld the FCC’s order for (3) and (4).
1. Definition of Autodialer was Too Broad
When the regulation was established in 2015, the FCC deemed an autodialer to be “any device that has the present or future capacity to function as an autodialer.” The court ruled that the definition of autodialer was too broad. In fact, the definition was so all encompassing that it included smartphones and had the potential to entangle everyday consumers in litigation. At a rate of $500 per instance, consumers could have been on the hook for thousands of dollars for sending something like an evite via SMS or MMS to a group of friends. The court held that this is an unreasonably expansive interpretation of the TCPA.
Are you or your company inviting charitable donations to fill out a tournament bracket for a shot at the prize? Putting aside the typical lottery and game of chance issues, involving a charity or charitable donations in your March Madness celebrations could weave other legal compliance webs – namely, triggering compliance with state charitable promotion laws. In this bylined article for Corporate Counsel, InfoLawGroup Partner, Heather Nolan, explains the laws and regulations that companies need to follow when raising money for charity.
For the musically inclined, think of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as “theme and variations.” The principles and terminology are standard across Europe, but there are many instances where the application will vary to some extent from country to country. An example of non-standardization is the varying national age limit, from 13 to 16, beyond which parental consent is required to collect information about children. Another is the entire field of HR privacy (!), as each EU country is largely free to specify how the general principles of the GDPR will be applied in the employment context.
Such diversity has historically been a challenge for multinationals and online businesses operating in European markets. The GDPR should indeed produce more “harmonization,” compared to the 1995 EU Data Protection Directive, but there will still be variations after GDPR enforcement begins in May. This article highlights areas where national differences matter, as well as some strategies for dealing with those variations. Continue Reading
With stepped up enforcement from the FTC and the California auto-renewal law updates going into effect in July, InfoLawGroup Partner Jamie Rubin offers companies insights on running auto-renewal subscription programs. Read his article in Internet Retailer magazine.
InfoLawGroup is holding a series of popup panel discussions called “cocktails and conversations.” Our latest discussion was about what it takes for women to ascend to the upper echelons of business and featured successful entrepreneur and CEO, Fran Maier.
Fran is now the CEO of one of the fastest growing gig-economy startups, Babierge, which is changing the way parents travel with children all across the country. Babierge has had lightening fast growth over the past year and a half, but its rapid success is not surprising considering Fran brings the experience of being co-founder of Match.com, former CEO of TRUSTe (now TrustArc) and former board member of GE Capital Bank. She has served as Chair of the Stanford for Women on Boards initiative and has been and advisor and angel investor for several start-ups.
Following are some of the key takeaways that Fran offered to women looking to launch successful businesses and/or to break through barriers to the Boardroom.
Play to Win
Fran started off the discussion by talking about how women are the heart of small business yet only 2% of venture-backed businesses are women owned. And, According to 2020 Women on Boards, 29% of Fortune 1000 companies still have one or no women on the Board. Most of the problem lies in how money is raised and how boardroom talent is sourced, but women can also hold themselves back.
Fran gave examples of times in her career when she has seen women decide to cash in their chips early on in the lifecycle of a startup or lay off employees rather than invest their own money to keep the startup growing. She said that same fear that makes women risk adverse also stops them from asking for what they want, such a money and board assignments.
“Women play to survive,” said Fran. “Women should play to win.”
Support Other Women
Women who play to win support each other. For example, in the ’90s, in between ventures and lamenting the recession over drinks, Fran and a female peer vowed to always help each other in business. Fran coached her friend on landing a high profile position at a leading technology company. Then, when Fran was the CEO of TRUSTe and transitioning it from a non-profit to a venture backed for-profit, her friend introduced her to a woman at a leading venture capital firm who would become TRUSTe’s lead investor and later Babierge’s first angel investor. The more women who reach out and support each other, the further women will come in making strides in the C-suite and the boardroom. Professional women should avail themselves to the plethora of opportunities (SheEO and Portfolia, for example) to invest and advise early women-led start-ups
Ask for What You Want and Be Persistent
Sometimes you have to make “unreasonable requests.” Of course you will not always get what you ask for, but you will never get what you do not ask for. Persistence is the key success. And making sure that you are brave enough to ask for help as well as to make the “big asks” – whether that be venture capital money, or equity, or a title or whatever it is that you need and want to be a success. The first step is to know who to ask and then to ask.
Network and Get on the Lists
Networking remains the dominant means that companies source boardroom talent. Going back to the importance of asking for what you want, women should tell the people around them, including their higher ups, that they are interested in serving on a board. There are also specific board registries that connect women with boardroom opportunities and anyone thinking about pursuing a corporate board position should investigate those services. (BoardList, Equilar, . . . )
Build A Boardroom Ready Resume
Women need to keep in mind that pursuing a boardroom position is different than landing a job. When it comes to breaking through the barriers to the boardroom, women should think about the functional experience that boards need in this current business climate and highlight how their experience alleviates the board’s pain points.
For example, many board members lack the technology knowledge to navigate a business environment riddled with privacy and security risks. Women with privacy, security and e-commerce talent should emphasize these skills on their boardroom resumes. You may also have specific finance or other relevant experience. Work with a consultant or talk to anyone you can to learn how to make your resume read “board ready.”