Brand Protection, trademark, intellectual property, IP
Brand Protection in an AI-Driven World: Part 3 Registering Your Mark
By Rosanne Yang on February 09, 2026
Brand Protection, trademark, intellectual property, IP
Brand Protection in an AI-Driven World: Part 2 Clearing Your Mark
By Rosanne Yang on January 28, 2026
Brand Protection, trademark, intellectual property, IP
Brand Protection in an AI-Driven World Part 1: Ideating Your Mark
By Rosanne Yang on January 12, 2026
Artificial Intelligence, AI, trademark, intellectual property, IAPP
InfoLawGroup AI Roundup: Oct 18, 2023
By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 18, 2023
trademark, copyright, Right of Publicity, Drake, Laugh Now Cry Later
Drake & 21 Savage Sued by Condé Nast over Fake Vogue Issue
By Benjamin Stein on November 10, 2022
trademark
Lost in Cyberspace: Real World Trademarks vs. the Metaverse: Re-Evaluating a Portfolio for the Metaverse, NFTs, and Digital Assets
By Rosanne Yang on June 23, 2022
trademark, intellectual property
A Heartwarming Trademark Story Perhaps, but Don’t Try This at Home
By Rosanne Yang on August 02, 2021
trademark, Branding, Brand Protection
Brand Protection Today – Article 1: Choose Wisely
By W. Scott Blackmer & Sara Skinner Chubb on February 03, 2021
branding, copyright, marketing, trademark
Six Things to Know About Trademarks
By InfoLawGroup LLP on August 24, 2014
generic marks, genericide, trademark
A Trademark Diamond Setting in the Rough: The Risk of Trademark “Genericide”
By InfoLawGroup LLP on February 06, 2014
advertising, copyrights, defamation, disparagement, Facebook, Facebook twitter LinkedIn defamation disparagement intellectual property trad..., intellectual property, LinkedIn, NRLA, NRLB, privacy, Security, social media, social network, social network social media security privacy advertising ECPA Stored Communic..., Stored Communications Act, trademark, twitter
The Legal Implications of Social Networking: The Basics (Part One)
By InfoLawGroup LLP on June 11, 2011
Much like the "Cloud computing revolution" there is an almost frenzied excitement around social media, and many companies are stampeding to exploit social networking. The promise of increased intimate customer interactions, input and loyalty, and enhanced sales and expanded market share can result in some organizations overlooking the thorny issues arising out of social networking. Many of these issues are legal in nature and could increase the legal risk and liability potential of an organization employing a social media strategy.In this multi-part series the InfoLawGroup will identify and explore the legal implications of social media. This series will help organizations begin to identify some of the legal risks associated with social media so that they may start addressing and mitigating these risks while maximizing their social media strategy.
In Part One of the series, we will provide a high level overview of the legal risks and issues associated with an organization's use of social media. In subsequent parts members of the InfoLawGroup team will take a deeper dive into these matters, and provide some practical insight and strategic direction for addressing these issues. As always, we view our series as the beginning of a broader conversation between ourselves and the larger community, and we welcome and strongly encourage comments, concerns, corrections and criticisms.
domain name disputes, Domain Names, ICANN, sunrise period, trademark, trademark claims services, Trademark Clearinghouse, Uniform Rapid Suspension, URS, WIPO
Domain Name Extensions Extended Again
By W. Scott Blackmer on December 14, 2010
ICANN decided Friday to postpone approval of procedures for organizations to propose new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). Companies anticipating the need to protect trademarks in a potentially large number of new gTLDs will have at least a few more months to understand and weigh in on the proposals, and to brace themselves for successive rounds of sunrise filings and domain name disputes as new gTLDs are introduced.
AdWords, Electronic Commerce Directive, European Union, fair trade practices, Google, keyword advertising, service provider liability, trademark, unfair competition
European Court Hands Google a Keyword Victory but Warns Online Advertisers
By W. Scott Blackmer on March 26, 2010
The European Court of Justice rules that Google is not liable for automated keyword advertising based on brand names. Advertisers, however, may be liable under trademark and fair competition laws if the ads misleadingly suggest that they link to the trademark owner.