"AB 370", CalOPPA, Do Not Track
California's "Do Not Track" Disclosure Bill, AB 370, is Not Law Yet
By InfoLawGroup LLP on September 10, 2013
Do Not Call Regulations, Google, privacy, Street View, wi-fi
Wiretap Act Exception Did Not Protect Google's Collection of Street View Wi-Fi Data
By InfoLawGroup LLP on September 10, 2013
contests, Facebook, privacy, social media, sweepstakes
Sweepstakes and Contests Now Easier To Run on Facebook
By Jamie Rubin on August 27, 2013
Georgia, Gramm-Leach-Bliley, negligence
Georgia Supreme Court Holds That Gramm-Leach-Bliley Statutory Policy Statement Does Not Create Legal Duty Under State Negligence Law
By InfoLawGroup LLP on June 26, 2013
Arkansas, social media
Arkansas Becomes Seventh State to Enact Employer Social Media Law; Questions Arise Regarding Supervisor-Employee Connections
By InfoLawGroup LLP on May 03, 2013
FTC UPDATED FAQs FOR AMENDED COPPA RULE: KEY POINTS
By Justine Young Gottshall on April 29, 2013
California’s “Right to Know Act”: Are New Privacy Disclosure Requirements on the Horizon?
By InfoLawGroup LLP on April 15, 2013
anonymity, defamation, First Amendment, free speech, privacy, social media
Illinois Court Protects Identity of Anonymous Online Speaker
By InfoLawGroup LLP on February 10, 2013
"Credit Card Act", California, CalOPPA, Do Not Call Regulations, downloads, iTunes, Song-Beverly
California Supreme Court: Online Sales of Downloadable Products Not Covered by Song-Beverly Credit Card Act
By InfoLawGroup LLP on February 06, 2013
email, privacy, SCA, Stored Communications Act
Does the Stored Communications Act Protect an Email's Subject Line From Disclosure?
By InfoLawGroup LLP on January 30, 2013
attitudes, consumer, Ponemon, privacy, survey
New Ponemon Study Lists Top Privacy Features Consumers View As Important, Ranks Most Trusted Companies for Privacy
By InfoLawGroup LLP on January 29, 2013
California, CalOPPA, Guidelines, Mobile, Privacy Policy
California AG Releases Mobile App Guidelines; Industry Responds
By InfoLawGroup LLP on January 17, 2013
Do Not Call Regulations, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, privacy, social media
FTC Report: Mobile Apps For Kids Not Making The Grade (NOTE: Not Just A Privacy Report)
By Jamie Rubin on December 19, 2012
Apps, Attorney General, CalOPPA, Kamala Harris, Mobile, Privacy Policy
California Attorney General Sues Delta Air Lines for Failing to Have a Mobile App Privacy Policy
By InfoLawGroup LLP on December 10, 2012
Apps, Attorney General, CalOPPA, Kamala Harris
Trick or Treat: California's AG Notifies Nearly 100 Apps of Need for Privacy Policy
By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 31, 2012
GAO Study Gives Low Marks to Companies Regarding Transparency to Consumers of Use of Location Data
By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 24, 2012
Do Not Call Regulations, NLRB, social media
Employers Must Consider Social Media Risks to Life and Limb, Not Just Pocketbook
By InfoLawGroup LLP on September 10, 2012
Boris, byod, California, EEOC, employee, employment, Illinois, Law, Maryland, Media, Michigan, Nihar, NLRA, NLRB, privacy, privacy law, Segalis, Shah, Social
Illinois Second State to Enact Law Barring Employers from Obtaining Current or Prospective Employees' Social Media Account Credentials
By InfoLawGroup LLP on August 06, 2012
Act, Amazon, Apple, California, communications, Communications Act, FCC, FTC, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, Mobile, privacy, RIM
FCC Seeks Public Comment on Mobile Carrier Privacy Policies Following Data Collection Controversy
By InfoLawGroup LLP on June 29, 2012
In re-launching the inquiry into carriers' data privacy and security practices, the FCC argues that not informing customers about the software or its data practices may have violated the carriers' responsibility pursuant to Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934 to protect customer data "that is made available to a carrier solely by virtue of the carrier-customer relationship." The law allows such data to be used only in "limited circumstances," a term which is not defined in Section 222. It appears that one of the goals of the renewed inquiry is for the FCC to define the scope of the "limited circumstances."
affirmative express consent, Do Not Track, Gateway, material change, retroactive, twitter
Twitter's New Tailored Suggestion Service Raises Questions
By InfoLawGroup LLP on June 05, 2012
The buzz words in privacy over the last few months (really longer than that) have been "Do Not Track." Twitter is just the latest company to adopt the DNT browser option, indicating in a blast email to all Twitter users that the setting is now available for implementation if a user so chooses. Interestingly, however, a much less publicized setting was also presented in that same email blast: Twitter's new "tailored suggestion feature." Applications and widgets created by Twitter will begin to collect data about Twitter users from third party websites that feature those products. This is an entirely new feature from Twitter, and is being implemented as a default option for both new and existing Twitter users.