Andy Warhol, Supreme Court, Fair Use
Pop Art, The Supreme Court, and You
By Sophia Allen on June 04, 2023
e-commerce, retail or online retail, Supreme Court, taxation, taxes
Major U.S. Supreme Court Decision Allows States to Charge Sales Tax for Online Purchases
By Tatyana Ruderman on June 22, 2018
copyright, False advertising, Lanham Act, standing, Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court Provides a National Standard for Who Can Sue for False Advertising Under the Lanham Act
By InfoLawGroup LLP on April 01, 2014
Act, Amazon, Apple, California, communications, Communications Act, FCC, FTC, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft, Mobile, privacy, RIM
FCC Seeks Public Comment on Mobile Carrier Privacy Policies Following Data Collection Controversy
By InfoLawGroup LLP on June 29, 2012
In re-launching the inquiry into carriers' data privacy and security practices, the FCC argues that not informing customers about the software or its data practices may have violated the carriers' responsibility pursuant to Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934 to protect customer data "that is made available to a carrier solely by virtue of the carrier-customer relationship." The law allows such data to be used only in "limited circumstances," a term which is not defined in Section 222. It appears that one of the goals of the renewed inquiry is for the FCC to define the scope of the "limited circumstances."
aggregation, data, Fourth Amendment, GPS, Jones, location, reasonable expectation of privacy, Supreme Court, surveillance
Location, Location, Location
By InfoLawGroup LLP on November 15, 2011
Tanya Forsheit recently appeared on Fox to discuss the Supreme Court's evaluation of GPS surveillance under the Fourth Amendment in US v. Jones. The case raises important issues regarding technology, aggregation of data, and privacy expectations with respect to location information.
California, children, data mining, First Amendment, health information, Info Law Group, InfoLawGroup, information law group, InformationLawGroup, Nicole Friess, pharmaceutical companies, privacy, privacy legislation, Supreme Court, Vermont, video games
Supreme Court Pro-Business and First Amendment - Targeted Regulations in Trouble
By InfoLawGroup LLP on June 28, 2011
AT&T, FOIA, InfoLawGroup, information law group, personal privacy, privacy law, Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Corporations Not Entitled to "Personal Privacy" under FOIA Exemption
By InfoLawGroup LLP on March 01, 2011
communications, data protection, data protection law, enforcement, Israel, privacy, privacy litigation, privacy news, telecommunications
Tel-Aviv District Court Finds No "Right to Forget"
By InfoLawGroup LLP on December 03, 2010
As reported by Dan Or-Hof, Manager of the Information Technology, Internet and Copyright group at the Israeli law firm of Pearl Cohen Zedek & Latzer, in a first of its kind decision, the Tel-Aviv district court ruled on November 30, 2010 that a subscriber of cellular services does not have a general right to have his phone records deleted.
acceptable use policy, California constitution privacy clause, communications, content review, employee, employer, Fourth Amenment, monitoring, Ninth Circuit, Quon, search, Stored Communications Act, Supreme Court
Quon: US Supreme Court Rules Against Privacy on Employer-Issued Devices
By W. Scott Blackmer on June 17, 2010
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision today in City of Ontario, California v. Quon, ruling that a public employer's examination of an employee's personal text messages on a government-issued pager did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Justice Kennedy's opinion for the Court remarked that a review of messages on an employer-provided device would similarly be regarded as "reasonable and normal in the private-employer context."
