Insights on Senate,wifi

Apple, Apple Apps Commission DOJ Privacy mobile privacy FTC Franken Whitehouse Cobur..., Apps, Coburn, Commission, data protection, DOJ, Fox, Franken, FTC, Google, Hearing, InfoLawGroup, information law group, InformationLawGroup, Leahy, location, Mobile, mobile privacy, privacy, privacy by design, Privacy, Technology and the Law, Segalis, Senate, Senate Hearing, Senate Subcommittee, smartphone, Technology and the Law, tracking, Whitehouse

InfoLawGroup Speaks with Fox Live about Mobile Privacy

By InfoLawGroup LLP on May 12, 2011

On May 10, 2011, the Senate Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law held a hearing on mobile privacy. We covered the hearing in detail on our blog. Yesterday, InfoLawGroup partner Boris Segalis spoke with Fox Live's Tracy Byrnes about the balance between business and consumer interests that mobile privacy implicates.The clip from the interview is available on Fox at http://video.foxnews.com/v/4689248/the-congressional-mobile-privacy-hearing/?playlist_id=86861

Apple, Apps, Commission, data, Data Privacy Law or Regulation, Department, Department of Justice, Devices, DOJ, Federal, Federal Trade Commission, Franken, FTC, Google, group, Hearing, InfoLawGroup, information, information law group, InformationLawGroup, Justice, Law, Leahy, Legislation, location, location data, location tracking, Mobile, Mobile Devices, of, or, privacy, privacy legislation, Regulation, Senate, smartphones, tracking, Trade, wifi

Senate Subcommittee Holds Hearing on Mobile Privacy

By InfoLawGroup LLP on May 09, 2011

2011, Act, advertising, Behavioral, behavioral advertising, bill, Commercial, Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2011, data, Data Privacy Law or Regulation, FTC, group, identifiable, InfoLawGroup, information, information law group, InformationLawGroup, Kerry, Law, Legislation, McCain, of, or, personally, personally identifiable information, pii, privacy, privacy bill of rights, privacy enforcement, privacy legislation, Regulation, rights, Senate

Kerry Releases Draft of "Privacy Bill of Rights"

By InfoLawGroup LLP on March 25, 2011

20/20, ABA, client confidentiality, COPRAC, encrypt, encryption, ethics, Formal Opinion Interim No- 08-0002, lawyers, New York State Bar Association, online storage, Opinion 842, professional responsibility, State Bar of California, technology, wifi

Legal Implications of Cloud Computing -- Part Five (Ethics or Why All Lawyers-Not Just Technogeek Lawyers Like Me-Should Care About Data Security)

By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 19, 2010

So, you thought our cloud series was over? Wishful thinking. It is time to talk about ethics. Yes, ethics. Historically, lawyers and technologists lived in different worlds. The lawyers were over here, and IT was over there. Here's the reality: Technology - whether we are talking cloud computing, ediscovery or data security generally - IS very much the business of lawyers. This post focuses on three recent documents, ranging from formal opinions to draft issue papers, issued by three very prominent Bar associations -- the American Bar Association (ABA), the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA), and the State Bar of California (CA Bar). These opinions and papers all drive home the following points: as succinctly stated by the ABA, "[l]awyers must take reasonable precautions to ensure that their clients' confidential information remains secure"; AND lawyers must keep themselves educated on changes in technology and in the law relating to technology. The question, as always, is what is "reasonable"? Also, what role should Bar associations play in providing guidelines/best practices and/or mandating compliance with particular data security rules? Technology, and lawyer use of technology, is evolving at a pace that no Bar association can hope to meet. At the end of the day, do the realities of the modern business world render moot any effort by the Bar(s) to provide guidance or impose restrictions? Read on and tell us - and the ABA - what you think.