TCPA, SCOTUS, mini-TCPA
SCOTUS Ended Debate on Autodialer Definition, But this Isn't the End of the TCPA
By Justine Young Gottshall & Brian C. Schaller on April 06, 2021
TCPA, Texting, SCOTUS
Big News for Businesses That Call or Text!
By InfoLawGroup LLP on April 01, 2021
TCPA, SCOTUS
Big Changes Coming to Calling & Texting Legal Landscape? TCPA Update
By Brian Schaller on December 18, 2020
TCPA, COVID-19, autodialer, Calling, Text Messaging
Calling/Texting Still a Minefield – Update on the TCPA during COVID-19
By Brian Schaller on May 29, 2020
TCPA, autodialer
Randomly Generated Rulings: Additional Narrower Definitions of “Autodialer” under the TCPA is Good for Callers (But Still Waiting to See What SCOTUS Will Do)
By Brian Schaller on February 20, 2020
TCPA, text messaging, FCC, telemarketing, Federal Communication Commission, Telphone Consumer Protection Act, Phone Calls
Finally, A (Sort Of) Real Solution to Avoid TCPA Liability for Reassigned Numbers—Businesses that Make Calls or Send Texts Should Pay Attention
By Brian Schaller on December 20, 2018
TCPA, ACA
TCPA Update: Autodialer Definition Broad, Narrowed, and Broad Again
By Brian Schaller on September 27, 2018
Do Not Call Regulations, privacy, statutes, TCPA, wireless
The FCC TCPA Order: What Does My Business Need To Know?
By Justine Young Gottshall on July 22, 2015
Consumer Protection, privacy, TCPA
The FCC May Make Important Clarifications to the TCPA
By Justine Young Gottshall on June 01, 2015
class action, Do Not Call Regulations, FCC, Lyft, primary jurisdiction, stay, TCPA
Litigation, Litigation, Go Away, Come Again Another Day: TCPA Lawsuit Stayed Pending FCC’s Resolution of Issues
By InfoLawGroup LLP on January 15, 2015
ATDS, attorneys fees, Connecticut, CUTPA, mini-TCPA, MMS, SMS, TCPA
New Connecticut Mini-TCPA Provides for Giant Penalties and Attorneys’ Fees
By InfoLawGroup LLP on July 23, 2014
CAA, Chesboro, consent, E-Sign, expected and desired business communications, GroupMe, intermediary, package delivery notification, prior express consent, prior express written consent, TCPA
Two FCC TCPA Orders Address Consent through an Intermediary, Provide First TCPA Exemption, and Hint at Future Directions
By InfoLawGroup LLP on April 11, 2014
TCPA, TCPA Litigation
Decision Holds “Prior Express Consent” To Send Transactional Text Messages is Present When Consumer Simply Provides Their Mobile Number; District Courts Split on Issue
By InfoLawGroup LLP on March 03, 2014
Do Not Call Regulations, SMS, TCPA, telemarketing, text messages
There’s Still Time Left To Comply: TCPA’s “Prior Express Written Consent” Requirement for Certain Text Messages and Calls Becomes Effective October 16
By InfoLawGroup LLP on August 16, 2013
arbitration, autodialer, SMS, TCPA, text messaging
Three Recent TCPA Cases Illustrate Divergent Treatment of Similar Conduct
By InfoLawGroup LLP on November 21, 2012
201 CMR 17-00, AES, anonymity, behavioral advertising, breach notification, California, cloud computing, contracts, DPA, Eavesdropping, encryption, EU Data Protection Directive, GLBA, HIPAA, HITECH, IAPP, Kearney, Massachusetts, personally identifiable information, pii, RFID, social networking, spam, SSN, TCPA, telemarketing, text messages, UK ICO, VPPA
Celebrating Data Privacy from A to Z
By InfoLawGroup LLP on January 28, 2010
In honor of Data Privacy Day and its spirit of education, I thought it might be appropriate (and fun) to celebrate some (but certainly not all) of the A, B, Cs of Data Privacy. Would love to see your contributions, too!
TCPA
Telephone Consumer Protection Act
By InfoLawGroup LLP on October 05, 2009
210 CMR 17-00, breach notification, creditors, driver's license, FACTA, Fair Credit Reporting Act, FCRA, financial account, FIPS, FTC, generally accepted, health information, HIPAA, HITECH, key management, laptops, Massachusetts, medical data, Nevada, payment card, Payment Card Industry Digital Security Standard, PCI DSS, portable devices, public networks, Red Flags, Red Flags Rule, Security, social security number, SSN, wireless
Code or Clear? Encryption Requirements (Part 2)
By W. Scott Blackmer on October 01, 2009
In the last post, I talked about the role of encryption in fashioning a "reasonable" security plan for sensitive personal information and other protected data routinely collected, stored, and used by an enterprise. But lawmakers and regulators are getting more specific about using encryption and managing data that is risky from an ID-theft perspective. Here are some leading examples of this trend.
appropriate, civil litigation, compliance, FTC, legal requirements, negligence, portable devices, public networks, reasonable, security measures, unfair practices, wireless
Code or Clear? Encryption Requirements under Information Privacy and Security Laws (Part 1)
By W. Scott Blackmer on October 01, 2009
"Exactly what data do we have to encrypt, and how?" That's a common question posed by IT and legal departments, HR and customer service managers, CIOs and information security professionals. In the past, they made their own choices about encryption, balancing the risks of compromised data against the costs of encryption. Those costs are measured not merely by expense but also by increased processing load, user-unfriendliness, and the remote but real possibility of lost or corrupted decryption keys resulting in inaccessible data. After weighing the costs and benefits, most enterprises decided against encryption for all but the most sensitive applications and data categories.